IRCC.com

By

Thomas Partey denied Canadian visa for World Cup; appeal dismissed

Parliament Hill, Ottawa at golden hour with autumn maples

Ghanaian international Thomas Partey was refused a Canadian visitor visa ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, and a Canadian court dismissed his appeal in mid-June 2026. As a result, he was unable to travel to Toronto for Ghana's opening match.

There is no new IRCC policy behind this decision. Contrary to some headlines, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada did not announce a "new assessment approach" that takes effect immediately, and it did not change how applications are decided. What IRCC provided was a standard statement it has long used: that every person seeking to come to Canada is assessed individually, based on the facts available and the law that applies, while keeping the safety and security of Canadians a priority. That principle is not new, and it did not replace any earlier practice.

Partey's application was refused in the context of criminal charges he faces in the United Kingdom. He has been charged with multiple counts of rape and a count of sexual assault, has pleaded not guilty, and is reported to be scheduled to stand trial in London in 2027. According to reporting on the case, IRCC also raised concerns about whether his application met the requirement to answer questions truthfully, and referenced possible inadmissibility related to misrepresentation.

Partey and the Ghanaian government challenged the refusal, with Ghana publicly calling the decision unfair. An appeal was heard in Ottawa and the original refusal was upheld. Notably, the United States had granted Partey a visa — a reminder that each country decides admissibility under its own laws, and a favourable decision in one country does not bind another.

For ordinary applicants, the takeaway is unchanged and long-standing: answer every question completely and truthfully, disclose criminal charges and convictions when asked, and understand that serious criminality or misrepresentation can make a person inadmissible to Canada regardless of the reason for travel.

This is general information, not legal advice — for your situation, consult an authorized immigration representative.

A small portion of this article — research support, fact-cross-checking, and copy-editing — was assisted by AI tooling. Editorial decisions, source verification, and final sign-off remain with our team. We cite primary sources from canada.ca for every factual claim.

Last reviewed: June 14, 2026

IRCC.com is an independent news site and not affiliated with the Government of Canada.

Want the next IRCC update in your inbox?

Weekly digest. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Free tools for this topic

More news

Comments

For general discussion only. We can’t review individual cases or give immigration advice — for that, contact a licensed representative.

Comments post instantly. Spam and abuse are filtered automatically.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.